ASC 842 Lease Accounting

Lease accounting is strange. I remember back pre-lease accounting when we heard for 20 years about THIS being the year FASB might get lease accounting done for GAAP. Before that, there were operating leases and financing leases. Operating was essentially a normal lease of equipment with no balance sheet impacts, and a financing one where you lease it for so long or paid back so much of the original asset price that you might as well be considered as having bought the dang thing so you recorded like you did. What ASC 842 did was bring operating leases on the GAAP books like they were financing leases (loosely).

Understand it takes quite a bit to trigger a “financing” lease for tax purposes, ie, one where you can depreciate it for tax. So we are going to assume for this conversation that what you have in hand is not an acquisition of an asset for tax purposes.

For tax, there is no lease liability basis for an ASC 842 lease. There isn’t even an asset to have basis in. Tax is raising its eyebrows skeptically and saying, “Yeah, no. That’s just rent expense.” All the drama belongs to GAAP on this subject.

What the heck IS GAAP doing? Lets look at a GAAP classified financing type lease.

Pretend I enter into an agreement to rent equipment for 5 years at $25k rent expense per year. GAAP looks at the $125k in payments over 5 years and figures out that the present value of that stream of payments is $118k (I’m making up numbers here). The difference is going to be “interest expense”, time value of money. So the first year GAAP entry looks as follows:

Right of Use Asset                        118,000

Lease Liability                                                 118,000

Tax is over here rolling its eyes at GAAP.

GAAP has two cumulative entries at the end of the year. The first is the amortization of the ROU Asset (yeah, no, we are totally depreciating this thing like its a REAL fixed asset, but since its a “right” or intangible, its amortization).

Amortization expense                 24,000

Accumulated amortization                        24,000

Next, we owe rent of $25k for the year. Mix in drama and GAAP records that as:

Interest expense                              2,000

Lease Liability                                 23,000

Cash                                                                     25,000

Notice there is no rent expense for GAAP. Its “amortization” of the ROU Asset. Bizarre.

So, at the end of the year we have the following account balances debit (credit) to calculate our DTA/DTL from:

GAAP                                 Tax

Right of Use Asset (net of AA)                               94,000                                 –

Lease Liability                                                                 (95,000)                              –

Interest expense                                                            2,000                                    –

Amortization expense                                                 24,000                                 –

Rent expense                                                                  –                                              25,000

Notice tax has rent expense of $25k, the amount of cash paid for rent.

If this was all the activity in the entity during the year, the current provision would be as follows:

Pretax GAAP loss                                         (26,000)

ROU Present Year                                       (94,000)

ROU Prior Year                                              –

Lease Liability Present Year                   95,000

Lease Liability Prior Year                          –             

Tax loss                                                              (25,000)

Be aware of a major pitfall, though.

This ROU Asset is likely on the schedule of fixed assets. The amortization expense may even been mixed in with other amortization expense, or even recorded in one joint depreciation/amortization expense account.

Now, best practice is to take a balance sheet approach and compare the tax and GAAP basis of balance sheet accounts, but some tax preparers stick to an income statement approach. If an income statement approach is taken, and amortization of ROU is mixed in with other fixed asset amortization then you might have a bit of a headache. (I personally never rely on income statement approach, as you need to tie out each and every DTA/DTL to ending detailed support, so you might as well have basis rollforwards for each DTA/DTL.)

That example above was for a financing lease. An operating lease is similar except that GAAP will not book to amortization and interest expense, it will book to “lease expense”, or essentially rent expense, in order to reduce the ROU Asset. There is still an amortization schedule that has implied interest expense in it, the name of the income statement account is just different.

The last lease type is a sales back lease. It’s very similar in treatment to a financing lease. This is the lease most likely to be an actual asset sale for tax. Now that you know the basics for leases, this one you can figure out on your own.

Leave a reply to Yan Cancel reply

2 responses to “ASC 842 Lease Accounting”

  1. Yan Avatar
    Yan

    if it is a true lease for tax purpose, not an acquisition of an asset for tax purposes., where do we show the interest exp and amortization exp in related to ASC 842 on 1120 page 1? Are these all “rent” expense on the 1120?

    Like

    1. Tax Sophomore Avatar

      Operating/true lease has GAAP booking to a “lease expense” account, which is probably already mapped to the rent expense account. It’s the finance style lease that breaks out interest expense and amortization expense for GAAP that would need to be reclassed.

      Sometimes you see the adjustment for finance lease left down in line 26 other deductions in a miscellaneous deduction for just the M-1 step up/step down instead of a true reclass, so interest and amortization (if finance lease) remains unchanged at GAAP amounts. But now that 163j is back to adjusting for depreciation and amortization when calculating the interest limitation, I could imagine it’s more important to get this accurately reflected if that amortization adjustment is larger so I would recommend reclassing interest and amortization on the financing leases to rent expense.

      Like

Leave a reply to Yan Cancel reply